I am now getting towards the end of my first term on the Cities
and Cultures masters course at Queen Mary. I’ve finished all three pieces of
coursework due in this term, which is a great relief, although now I have to
think about planning for two large hand-ins in January after the winter break.
Lurking in the background amidst all this is the d word (that’s ‘dissertation’),
which I have to be considering even at this early stage. Before I talk more
about what the next steps are, though, I’ll say a bit about what I’ve been
doing during the course so far.
My course is made up of 4 modules alongside the
dissertation. These are:
- Geographical Thought and Practice, a compulsory module
running across the first two terms that gives a grounding in geographical
theory, writing and research methods.
- Cities, Space and Power, which runs only for the current
term, with the final coursework deadline in January. This module focuses on the
public spaces of cities, and started off by thinking about what ‘public space’
and ‘public’ mean, and how modern Western understandings of public space arose
in the 17th century. We then looked at how public space could be
understood from a non-Western perspective, using the post-colonial city of
Calcutta and how it is represented in film and other art. In this last section
of the module, the focus shifts to contemporary cities, and issues that arise
from different uses and regulations of public spaces.
- Cultural Geography in Practice, another module only running
this term with the final coursework hand-in in January. So far, we have looked
at how geographers have used creative practices as a form of research and
dissemination in cultural geography, particularly through collaborations with
institutions such as museums and art galleries. In this second half of the
term, the focus is more on the concept of ‘home’, including how this is
affected by migration, and how creative projects have tried to communicate
geographical ideas about the complexity of home as a space of belonging,
shelter and rootedness, but also potentially detachment, loneliness and violence.
- Art, Performance and the City, a module that will be running
next term. This will look at the relationship between art and the city through
urban cultural practices (e.g. urban exploring and walking) and projects by
artists in London.
The material for these modules is organised around a series
of 2-hour seminars, that I have once a week for each module. This currently
means that I only to go into university twice a week, which is incredibly
useful and money-saving given that I’m living at home and commuting into
London. For each of these seminars we have reading to do in advance, so that we
can have an engaged discussion on the material during the 2-hour slots. Apart
from coursework, this is my main consistent source of workload. This is
typically what I’ll be doing at the library in Canterbury during the week when
I don’t have seminars.
The seminar format itself is fantastic. At Cambridge, the
Geography undergraduate course is based solely on lectures and small follow-up
supervisions, which meant that there was limited opportunity to discuss issues
amongst a wider group of people, and between students ourselves. In this
masters course, not only is there ample opportunity to talk about our own perspectives
on particular topics on the reading, but because the students taking the
modules are so diverse (with some modules including people from
theatre/performance studies, exchange students and those with backgrounds in a
variety of subjects), the seminars are incredibly thought-provoking. I love
being able to hear from such a wide range of positions.
As well as seminars, field trips have also been an important
part of our modules. For Cities, Space and Power, we had a 2-hour guided walk
of Edwardian London, in which we navigated today’s streets while looking at
printouts of maps from the Edwardian period. This was a clever and interesting
way of looking at some of the changes in public space during this historical
period (such as the growth of green ‘squares’ in London), which we could see
traces of both in the physical environment and on the maps. We could also see
how public space had changed since the 1700s to create what we know as London
today.
In Cultural Geography in Practice, we visited the Geffrye Museum of the Home in Hoxton. This museum uses display rooms to show how the
interiors of homes have changed since the 1600s, and hosts other exhibitions
and events that look at the concept of ‘home’ – as much more than just a ‘house’,
but a place with emotional and symbolic importance. We’re fortunate enough to
be taught by Professor Alison Blunt for this part of the module, who has worked
closely with the Geffrye Museum and whose work on home has been path-breaking
within geography.
An striking outdoor feature at the front of the Geffrye Museum called 'The Last Hug' |
And finally for Geographical Thought and Practice, we
visited and learnt about the Jewish cemetery on the Queen Mary campus. This is
an extremely interesting site that says a lot about the migrant community of
the East End of London, and the university’s relationship with it.
As I said before, I’ve had three pieces of assessed work so
far, one for each of my modules this term. The first was a 1000-word definition
of public space for Cities, Space and Power, which you can read more about here.
For Cultural Geography in Practice, we had a 2000-word essay
about the values and challenges of creative public geography work (such as
exhibitions, collaborations, etc.)
And finally for Geographical Thought and Practice, our
2500-word task was to write summaries of two of the ideas/approaches we’d looked
at so far, and then write about how these can be applied to our own research
interests.
As you can see, it’s been a busy but very enjoyable first
term so far. It’s going to stay this way in the months ahead, starting with a
4000-word essay and a 3500-word exhibition proposal to submit after the winter
break! As I mentioned before, the dissertation will also start to gradually
tighten its grip on my life. This is a 15,000-word piece based on research I’ll
be doing from about May onwards, which counts for a third of my overall mark.
It’s very important. At this stage I’m still very torn between two ideas for
what I’ll be researching, but I’ll definitely be talking more on the blog in
the coming months about what I eventually decide to do.
What I can say for certain is that I really, really love
this course. It couldn’t really be better matched to what I’m interested in. I’m
also very impressed with both the Geography Department and the institution as a
whole at Queen Mary, and I feel lucky to have met so many kind, interesting, diverse,
and down-to-earth people since starting my masters here.
No comments:
Post a Comment